Supreme Court of India

Cce, Aurangabad v. M/s Videocon Industries Ltd. Thr. its Director

Neutral citation
Reported as [2023] 6 S.C.R. 259
Bench S. Ravindra Bhat and Dipankar Datta JJ.
Decided 29 March 2023

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

What the Court ordered

In view of the above decisions and the foregoing reasoning, the CESTAT’s reasoning and conclusions, in both cases, that the LCD CCE, AURANGABAD v.

Judgment, page 21

From the headnote

Customs Tariff Act, 1975 – First Schedule – Chapter 90 – LCD panels – Classification of – CESTAT held that the LCD panels imported by assesses were classifiable in Chapter He ading 9013.8010 of the First Schedule to the 1975 Act – Held: Reaso ning and conclusion of CESTAT that the LCD sets were classifiabl e under Chapter 90, Entry 9013.8010, is sound and unexception able. Customs Tariff Act, 1975 – First Schedule – Section XVI, XVII – Chapters 85 and 90 – General Interpretive Rules an d Notes – Plea of revenue that by virtue of Note 2 (b) to Cha pter 85, the goods are to be classified based

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.