Supreme Court of India

Orissa Administrative Tribunal Bar Association v. Union of India & Others

Neutral citation
Reported as [2023] 6 S.C.R. 731
Bench Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and Hima Kohli JJ.
Decided 21 March 2023

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We hold that the abolition of the OAT was constitutionally valid for the following reasons: a.

Judgment, page 74

From the headnote

Constitution of India: Art. 226 – Odisha Administrative Tribunal-OAT – Abo lition of, by Notification No. GSR 552( ) dt 2 August 2019 – Constitution al Validity of the Notification – Held: Abolition of OAT is constitutionally valid – Challenge to the constitutional validity of the impugned notification dated 2 August 2019 by which the OAT was abol ished is rejected - Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 – s. 4(2) – Gene ral Clauses Act, 1897 – s. 21. Article 226 – Odisha Administrative Tribunal-OAT – Abolition of – Writ petition before the Orissa High Court alleging violation of constitutional

Authorities it was built on

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 1 referred to · 1 mentioned

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.