Supreme Court of India
Rana Ayyub v. Directorate of Enforcement through its Assistant Director
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the view that the issue of terri torial jurisdiction cannot be decided in a writ petition, especially when there is a serious factual dispute about the place/places of commissi on of the offence.
Judgment, page 19
From the headnote
Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 – s. 3, 4, 44 and 45 – Penal Code, 1860 – ss. 4.3, 406, 418, 420 – In formation Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 – s. 66D – Black Money Act – s. 4 – Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 – s. 37 – Income Tax Act, 1961 – ss. 133(6) – Petitioner during the pandemic did the crowdfunding campaign using an online crowdfunding platform “Ketto” – Mumbai Zonal Office of the Enforcement Directorat e (ED) initiated inquiry under FEMA – Also, a complaint was lodged b y a person (private complainant) in Ghaziabad for the o ffences u/ss. 403, 406, 418, 420 of IPC,
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.