Supreme Court of India
M/s. Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited v. Oscar Investments Limited & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
In view of the above submissions, this Hon’ble Court, by orde r dated 18 February 2021, directed various banks and financial institutions to file affidavits responding to certain queries by this Hon’ble Court.
Judgment, page 51
From the headnote
Contempt of Court – Held: Contemnor Nos. 9 and 10 w ere held guilty of committing contempt of the orders passed by the High Court and Supreme Court – They were given an opportunity to pur ge themselves of contempt – However, the kind of asset s offered by Contemnor Nos.9 and 10 in their affidavit are so inadequate that it is impossible to satisfy the amount awarded in favour of the peti tioner in the foreign arbitral award – Thus, said Contemnors have failed to purge themselves of contempt – Considering the enormity of their actions, Contemnor Nos.9 and 10 sentenced to suffer the maximum
Authorities it was built on
- 1998 Supreme Court Bar Association v. Union of India
- 1994 Satyabrata Biswas and Ors v. Kalyan Kumar Kisku and Ors.
- 2012 Vidur Impex and Traders Pvt. Ltd. and Others v. Tosh Apartments Pvt. Ltd. and Others
- 1990 Dr. (mrs.) Roshan Sam Boyce v. B.R. Cotton Mills Ltd. and Ors.
- 2005 Delhi Development Authority v. Skipper Construction and Anr.
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.