Supreme Court of India
Shiv Kumar v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860: s.411 – Dishonestly receiving sto len property – Prosecution case was that the appellant- accused and co-accused received the articles looted from the truck k nowing fully well that those are stolen property – Trial court convicted both the accused u/s.411 – High Court confirmed the conviction – On appeal, held: To establish that a person is dealing with stolen propert y, the ‘believe’ factor of the person is of stellar import – It is not enough for prosecution to prove that the accused was either neg ligent or that he had a cause to think that the property was stolen, or
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 Sd. Shabuddin v. The State of Telangana
- 2025 Hiralal Babulal Soni v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Of those, 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.