Supreme Court of India
Raghavan Sasikumar v. Parameswaran Nadar Sathyananadhan Nadar Kanakottu Padippura Veedu and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court is unsustainable and the same deserves to be quashed and set aside and is accor dingly quashed and set aside.
Judgment, page 6
From the headnote
Suit – Suit filed for putting up a boundary wall/f ence on land – Trial Court dismissed the suit, which was confi rmed by the First Appellate Court – High Court, however, allowed second appeal and decreed the suit by upsetting concurrent findings re corded by both the Courts below and holding that defendant Nos. 1 to 3 could not have more than 10 cents of land as kudikidappukars and therefore, the plaintiffs were entitled to put up the boundary as per the Commissioner’s Plan and Report beyond the excess of 10 cents land – Held: In an earlier round of litigation instituted by the original
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.