Supreme Court of India

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-iii, Bangalore and Another v. M/s Wipro Limited

Neutral citation
Reported as [2022] 17 S.C.R. 36
Bench M. R. Shah and B. V . Nagarathna JJ.
Decided 11 July 2022

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

What the Court ordered

We hold that f or claiming the benefit under Section 10B (8) of the IT Act, t he twin conditions of furnishing a declaration before the assessing offic er and that too before the due date of filing the original return of income under section 139(1) are to be satisfied and both are mandatorily to be complied with.

Judgment, page 18

From the headnote

Income Tax Act, 1961 – Ss. 10B, 10B (5), 10B (8), 72, 32 (1) (ii-a), 80, 139 (1), 139 (5) – Return of income u/S 139 (1) – R evised return –Denial of claim of carrying forward of losses –Re spondent assessee filed return of income, declaring loss and claiming exemption u/S. 10 of IT Act along with a note that no loss is being carried forward – Subsequently, assessee filed a declaration before Assessing Officer (AO) stating that it does not wan t to avail the benefit u/10 as per S. 10 (8) and thereafter fi led a revised return of income wherein exemption u/10 was not c laimed and claim for

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.