Supreme Court of India
The State of Andhra Pradesh v. Raghu Ramakrishna Raju Kanumuru (m.p.)
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the considered view that the continuation of the proceedings before the learned NGT for the same cause of action, which is seized with the High Court, would not be in the interest of justice. 14.We, therefore, quash and set aside the proceedings pending before the learned NGT in O.A. No.361 of 2021.
Judgment, page 6
From the headnote
Constitution of India: Arts. 32, 226 and 323 – Terri torial jurisdiction of High Court – On facts, as regards, construction activities in the area, National Green Tribunal-NGT prohi bited the appellant from undertaking any further construction, when t he High Court was already in seisin of the matter and had passed an inter im order permitting the construction – Thereafter, NGT rejected the application seeking vacation of stay imposed on constructi on – On appeal held: Tribunals would be subordinate to the High Court insofar as the territorial jurisdiction of the High Court i s concerned – On
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.