Supreme Court of India
State of U.P. v. Veerpal & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, t he present appeal is allowed.
Judgment, page 14
From the headnote
Evidence Act, 1872 – s.32 – Dying declaration – Appreciation of – Dying declaration recorded by the Magistrate i n which deceased specifically stated that due to feud over demand of mone y, respondents-accused burnt her after pouring kerosen e over her – On facts, no reason to doubt the dying declaration recorded by the magistrate – Statements in the dying declaration co nsistent with medical evidence inasmuch as there were no injuries o n the chest and injuries were found only on the head and backsi de – Such injuries on the head and backside could have been possible only if somebody have
Authorities it was built on
- 1992 Smt. Paniben v. State of Gujarat
- 1975 Munnu Raja & Anr. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
- 1985 State of Uttar Pradesh v. Ram Sagar Yadav and Ors
- 2008 Amol Singh v. State of M.P.
- 1993 Kundula Bala Subrahmanyam and Anr. v. State of Andhra Pradesh
- 1999 Koli Chunilal Savji and Anr. v. State of Gujarat
- 2019 Jagbir Singh v. State
- 2008 Vikas & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.