Supreme Court of India

Venkatesh @ Chandra & Anr. Etc v. State of Karnataka

Neutral citation
Reported as [2022] 4 S.C.R. 556
Bench Uday Umesh Lalit and Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha JJ.
Decided 19 April 2022

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

What the Court ordered

We are of the opinion that the ends of justice would require that maximum punishment prescribed under section 394 Indian Penal Code is awarded to the accused, as the fact situation of this case requires that the sentence a warded to the accused should serve as a deterrent.

Judgment, page 21

From the headnote

Evidence Act, 1872: s.27 – Settled Legal Position – Going by the parameters of s.27 of the Evidence Act, only so much of information which relates distinctly to the facts the reby discovered can be stated to have been proved – Only that part of the state ment which leads to the discovery of certain facts alone could be marked in evidence and not the entire of the statement – All the ear lier facts narrated in the statement about past history which are in the nature of self-implication, would be inadmissible as amoun ting to a confession made to a police officer. Practice and Procedure: The

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.