Supreme Court of India

The State of Madhya Pradesh and Another v. M/s Commercial Engineers and Body Building Company Limited

Neutral citation
Reported as [2022] 14 S.C.R. 985
Bench M. R. Shah and Krishna Murari JJ.
Decided 14 October 2022

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

What the Court ordered

In view of the above and for the reasons stated above and without expressing anything on merits in favour of either of the parties on the Input rebate claimed by the respondent – original writ petitioner, the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court is here by quashed and set aside.

Judgment, page 7

From the headnote

Constitution of India: Art.226 – Writ jurisdiction in tax matter s – Writ petition filed challenging order of asssessing o fficer denying input rebate under s.14 of MP VAT Act, 2002 – Entertainability of – Held: High Court ought not to entertain the writ pe tition under Art.226 challenging the assessment order denying the In put rebate against which a statutory appeal would be available under s.46(1) of the MP VAT Act, 2002 – Alternative efficacious reme dy. Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: While entertaining the writ petition under Arti cle 226 of the Constitution of India challenging

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.