Supreme Court of India

Vijay Rajmohan v. State Represented by the Inspector of Police, Cbi, Acb, Chennai, Tamil Nadu

Neutral citation
Reported as [2022] 19 S.C.R. 563
Bench B. R. Gavai and Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha JJ.
Decided 11 October 2022

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We hold that upon expiry of the three months and the additional one-month period, the aggrieved party, be it the complainant, accused or victim, would be entitled to ap proach the concerned writ court.

Judgment, page 19

From the headnote

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1981 – s.19 – Central Vigilanc e Commission Act, 2003 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – elhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 – Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 – Whether an order of the Appointing Authority grant ing sanction for prosecution of a public servant u/s.19 of the PC Act, would be rendered illegal on the ground of acting as per di ctation if it consults the Central Vigilance Commission for its decision – Held: The position of law and the legal regime obtaine d by virtue of the five legislations, the Cr.P. , DSPE Act, PC Act , CVC Act, and

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.