Supreme Court of India
N. Raghavender v. State of Andhra Pradesh, Cbi
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
We are of the considered opinion that the Prosecution has failed to establish the charge of criminal breach of trust against the Appellant beyond a reasonable doubt.
Judgment, page 34
From the headnote
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – s.13(2) r/w s.1 3(1)(d) – Penal Code, 1860 – ss.409, 420, 477A – Criminal breach of tru st by public servant or Banker – Strong suspicion short o f conclusive proof – Case of prosecution that accused no.3-broth er-in-law of appellant-Branch Manager opened an account of the Acade my of which he was Treasurer – Allegedly, appellant and t he other co- accused also working in the Bank conspired with accused no.3 by allowing withdrawal of amounts from the said accoun t, despite insufficient funds – Appellant was further accused of pre-maturely encashing two
Authorities it was built on
- 2009 Md. Ibrahim & Ors. v. State of Bihar & Anr.
- 2012 Sadhupati Nageswara Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh
- 2017 Neera Yadav v. Central Bureau of Investigaton
- 1969 Hari Sao and Anr. v. State of Bihar
- 2014 Vinayak Narayan Deosthali v. C.B.I.
- 2012 N.V. Subba Rao v. State, through Inspector of Police, Cbi/spe,visakhapatnam, A.P.
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.