Supreme Court of India
Uttar Pradesh Forest Corporation Lucknow & Ors. v. Vijay Kumar Yadav & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
In view of the above, we modify the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court to the extent of maintaining the order of punishment for recovery of Rs.2,46,922.56 for the charge which was also held to be proved by the Enquiry Officer.
Judgment, page 2
From the headnote
Service Law: Punishment – Charge of causing loss to the extent of Rs.2.46 lacs was held to be proved by the enquiry officer – Punishment order for recovery of Rs.2.46 lacs pas sed – High Court set aside the punishment order – Held: High Court oug ht to have maintained the punishment order once the charge o f causing loss to the extent of Rs.2.46 lacs was held to be proved by enqui ry officer – Therefore, order modified to the extent of maint aining the order of punishment for recovery of Rs.2.46 lacs fo r the charge which was held to be proved by enquiry officer – Re spondent employee has
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.