Supreme Court of India

Sarabjeet Singh Mokha v. The District Magistrate, Jabalpur & Ors.

Neutral citation
Reported as [2021] 11 S.C.R. 468
Bench Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Vikram Nath and B V Nagarathna JJ.
Decided 29 October 2021

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We hold that the failure of the Central and the State Government to communicate the rejection of the appel lant’s representation in a time-bound manner is sufficient to vitiate the order of detention. 56 (2016) 3 SCC 437 SARABJEET SINGH MOKHA v.

Judgment, page 42

From the headnote

Constitution of India: Art.22(5) – Preventive deten tion – Protection to undertrials and detainees – Held: Art.22(5) mandates that (i) the authority making the order shall “as soo n as may be” communicate the grounds on which the order has been made to the person detained; and (ii) the detaining authority shall affor d to the person detained “the earliest opportunity of making a represen tation against the order” – Both these procedural requirements are mutually reinforcing – The communication, as soon as may be, of th e grounds of detention is intended to inform the detenu of the basis on

Authorities it was built on

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 1 mentioned

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.