Supreme Court of India
Kavitha Lankesh v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Karnataka Control of Organised Crimes Act, 2000: s. 24 – Purport of – The purport of s.24 is that informatio n regarding commission of an offence of organized crime under the 2000 Act can be recorded by a police officer only upon obtai ning prior approval of the police officer not below the rank o f the Deputy Inspector General of Police – What is crucial in th is provision is the factum of recording of offence of organized cri me and not of recording of a crime against an offender as such – Thus, only after registration of FIR, investigation for the concerned o ffence would proceed in which
Authorities it was built on
- 2005 Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
- 2007 State of Maharashtra and Ors. v. Lalit Somdatta Nagpal and Anr.
- 2007 Vinod G. Asrani v. State of Maharashtra
- 2017 State (nct of Delhi) v. Brijesh Singh @ Arun Kumar and Anr.
- 2015 Prasad Shrikant Purohit v. State of Maharashtra & Anr
- 1997 Sh. J.P.S. Saroha and Anr. v. Union of India and Anr.
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 Zakir Abdul Mirajkar v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
- 2022 Abhishek v. State of Maharashtra & Ors
Of those, 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.