Supreme Court of India

Commissioner of Customs, Pune v. M/s Ballarpur Industries Ltd.

Neutral citation
Reported as [2021] 9 S.C.R. 177
Bench Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Vikram Nath and Hima Kohli JJ.
Decided 21 September 2021

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

What the Court ordered

For the reasons recorded here under, I am not persuaded by these arguments of the said Importer.

Judgment, page 11

From the headnote

Anti-Dumping – Demand of anti-dumping duty on the product ‘Styrene Butadiene Rubber’ (SBR) – Two show cause noti ces dated 23.05.2006 and 30.06.2006 were issued to the respondent al leging that it had mis-declared its goods as ‘Lutex-701’ and ‘Lutex-780’, and they were goods SBR of 1900 series on which ant i-dumping duty was leviable – Goods were confiscated and anti-dumping duty, besides the levy of interest and penalty were impos ed – The Commissioner of Customs held that: (i) the goods were lev iable to confiscation in terms of s. 111(m) of the Customs Act 1962 ; (ii) the goods were

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.