Supreme Court of India
Madhav v. State of Madhya Pradesh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
We are of the considered view that the appea ls deserve to be allowed.
Judgment, page 18
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860: s. 302 rw s. 34 – Murder – Prosecut ion case that three accused, A1, A2 and A3 in furtherance o f common intention, attacked, brother of A1 with weapons, re sulting in his death – A2 took victim to the hospital and sent informa tion to the police that the assault was committed by PW 6 and 7 – Convicti on and sentence of A1, A2 and A3 u/s. 302 rw s. 34 by the courts below – Appeal by A2 and A3 before this Court – Held: Right from the beginning there was an attempt on the part of the p rosecution to shield the culprits named in the first FIR, on account of political pressure,
Authorities it was built on
- 2000 Gura Singh v. The State of Rajasthan
- 2013 R. Shaji v. State of Kerala.
- 2001 Kari Choudhary v. Most. Sita Devi and Ors.
- 2010 John Pandian v. State Rep. by Inspector of Police, T. Nadu
- 2012 Dr. Sunil Clifford Daniel v. State of Punjab
- 1987 Kansa Behera v. State of Orissa
- 2002 Raghunath v. State of Haryana and Ors.
- 2019 Balwan Singh v. The State of Chhattisgarh and Anr.
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.