Supreme Court of India

Rama Narang v. Ramesh Narang and Others Contempt Petition (civil) No. 92 of 2008

Neutral citation
Reported as [2021] 1 S.C.R. 389
Bench A. M. Khanwilkar and B. R. Gavai JJ.
Decided 19 January 2021

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

For the reasons recorded therein, the present responde nts are required to be held guilty for committing contempt of this Court and be punished in accordance with law.

Judgment, page 30

From the headnote

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971: s.2(b) – Contempt proceedings – Scope of – Violation of Consent Order – Petitioner a nd his sons (respondents) were the only Directors of a company – Dispute between petitioner and respondent-sons – Purported set tlement of the dispute in terms of Consent Order recorded in orders dated 12th December 2001 and 8th January 2002, of the Supreme Court – Petitioner-father filed contempt petition alleging t hat respondent- sons had violated the terms of the Consent Order – By judgment dated 15 th March, 2007, Supreme Court held respondents guilty o f contempt –

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 1 referred to

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.