Supreme Court of India

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. v. M/s. Pepsi Foods Ltd. (now Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd.)

Neutral citation
Reported as [2021] 4 S.C.R. 1
Bench R.F. Nariman J.
Decided 6 April 2021

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We hold that, where the delay in disposing of the appeal is not attributable to the assessee, the Trib unal has the 19 power to grant extension of stay beyond 365 days in deserving cases.

Judgment, page 18

From the headnote

Income Tax Act, 1961: s. 254(2A) third proviso – Pro vision as regards appellate tribunal granting stay – Third proviso pro viding for automatic vacation of a stay that has been gran ted on the completion of 365 days, whether or not the assessee is r esponsible for the delay caused in hearing the appeal – Constitutional validity of – Held: Third proviso to s. 254(2A), is both arb itrary and discriminatory and, thus, liable to be struck down as offendin g Art. 14 – Unequals are treated equally – No differentiation is m ade by the third proviso between the assessees who are res ponsible for

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.