Supreme Court of India
Hari Shankar Aggarwal v. The State of Rajasthan & Anr
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
In view of the foregoing reasons, we are of the view that the High Court as well as the learned Special Judge erred in r ejecting the case of the appellant.
Judgment, page 5
From the headnote
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 – ss.7/16 – Offence under – Cognizance taken against appellant by Courts below – If justified – Case of appellant that he was not a nominee of t he firm / company in question and there being no allegation ag ainst him, no cognizance of the offence could have taken against him – Held: As per s.17 of the Act, notice u/s.17(2) is contemplated b y company to Local Health Authority in such form and in such manner as prescribed that it has nominated such Director or M anager as a person who is responsible along with written consen t of such Director – On
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.