Supreme Court of India
The State Represented by the Deputy Superintendent of Police v. Tr N Seenivasagan
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the view that the rejection of the applications for recall under Section 311 was not in orde r.
Judgment, page 9
From the headnote
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – s.311 – Ambit of – FIR under PC Act registered in 2010 against respondent-Chief Engineer in the Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Company Limited (TANGEDCO) and other co-accused (since deceased) – Sanction to prosecute accorded – Final report filed in July 2011 – Prosecution evidence closed in October 2017 – Applications file d u/s.311 in 2019 for recalling PW-1(Chairman of TANGEDCO) and P W-11 (Deputy Superintendent of Police) – Dismissed – On ap peal, held: Having due regard to the nature and ambit of s.311, the application s filed by the prosecution
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 relied on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.