Supreme Court of India
The State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr. v. U.P. State Bridge Corporation Ltd.& Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
From the headnote
Tender – Rejection of bid on ground of omission and suppression of relevant fact – Public Works Department of t he State issued a Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) for the const ruction of an Elevated Corridor (Flyover) of a length of 7.473 Km – Eleven Companies bid for the said project including UPSBC, ‘R’ Bu ilders and ‘Ra’ Construction Co. – The State rejected bid o f UPSBC of sum of Rs. 306.27 crores on the ground that the bidder suppress ed information required under paragraph 13 of Appendix -I- and clause 7(b) of Annex-I of NIT – Hence, the bid of U PSBC was considered to be non-responsive –
Authorities it was built on
- 1979 Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. The International Airport Authority of India and Ors.
- 1994 Tata Cellular v. Union of India
- 2006 Jagdish Mandal v. State of Orissa and Ors.
- 2016 Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. v. Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. & Anr.
- 2016 Montecarlo Ltd. v. Ntpc Ltd.
- 2019 Haribhai Malaviya and Ors. v. The State of Gujarat and Anr.
- 2009 Bank of India & Anr. v. K. Mohandas & Ors.
- 2005 Secy. Deptt. of Home A.P. and Ors. v. B. Chinnam Naidu
- 2019 Caretel Infotech Ltd. v. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited & Ors.
- 2016 Central Coalfields Limited & Anr. v. Sll-sml (joint Venture Consortium) & Ors.
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.