Supreme Court of India
Hindustan Unilever Limited v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
Held as under: 9 AIR 1955 SC 84 HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED v.
Judgment, page 11
From the headnote
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 – s.17 – Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 – s.97 – General Clauses Act, 18 97 – s.6 – complaint was filed by inspector of Food and Health on the basis of a sample taken on 07.02.1989 in respec t of Dalda Vanaspati Khajoor Brand Ghee manufactured by the Co mpany – The said proceeding was decided by the Supreme Court in R. Banerjee & Ors. v. . . Dubey & Ors., wherein the matter was remanded back to the trial Magistrate to inquire into the question whet her the nomination forms nominating appellant and one anoth er person were received and
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 Dilip Hariramani v. Bank of Baroda
- 2021 Dayle De’souza v. Government of India through Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (c) and Another
- 2023 Manik Hiru Jhangiani v. State of M.p
Of those, 1 distinguished · 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.