Supreme Court of India

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax, Calicut v. M/s. Cera Boards and Doors, Kannur Kerala & Ors.

Neutral citation
Reported as [2020] 11 S.C.R. 471
Bench S. A. Bobde, A. S. Bopanna and V. Ramasubramanian JJ.
Decided 19 August 2020

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We are of the view that the orders of remand passed by the Tribunal, though for completely different reasons, were justified.

Judgment, page 42

From the headnote

Central Excise Act, 1944 – s.4 amended in 2000 – Charging of excise duty – Method of valuation of excisable goods – In present cases arising out of similar facts, assesses alleged ly undervalued the goods manufactured and cleared by them – Evaded the excise duty actually payable – Period of assessment pre & post 2000 Amendment – Adjudicating authorities inter alia held that there was undervaluation and evasion of excise duty – Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) though upheld said finding but remanded the matters back for re-quantification of duty – Held: Finding w.r.t

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 1 referred to

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.