Supreme Court of India

Shilpa Mittal v. State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Neutral citation
Reported as [2020] 2 S.C.R. 478
Bench Deepak Gupta and Aniruddha Bose JJ.
Decided 9 January 2020

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

In view of the above discussion we dispose of the appeal by answering the question set out in the first part of the judgment in the negative and hold that an offence which does not provide a minim um sentence of 7 years cannot be treated to be an heinous offence.

Judgment, page 21

From the headnote

Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015: ss. 2 (33) and 15 – Commission of offence u/s. 304 IPC – By a juvenile above 16 years and below 18 years of age – Juvenile Justice Board held that the juvenile having committ ed a heinous offence has to be tried as an adult – High Court held that since no minimum sentence is prescribed for the offence in q uestion, the offence did not fall within the ambit of s. 2(33) and hence was not a heinous offence – Appeal to Supreme Court – Held: n offence which does not provide a minimum sentence of 7 years cannot be treated to be a heinous

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 2 referred to · 2 mentioned

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.