Supreme Court of India

Samta Naidu & Anr. v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr.

Neutral citation
Reported as [2020] 2 S.C.R. 1127
Bench Uday Umesh Lalit and Vineet Saran JJ.
Decided 2 March 2020

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We are of the view that the second complaint in this case was on almost identical facts which was raised in the first complaint and which was dismissed on merits.

Judgment, page 16

From the headnote

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Second Complaint – Maintainability of – The first complaint contained the basic allegations that a vehicle belonging to the father of the parties, was sold after the death of their father with forge d signature – It was alleged that by the complainant that his brother and his brother’s wife had forged the signatures of the father on Form 29 and 30 and that on the basis of such forged documents the bene fit of “sale consideration of the vehicle” was derived by them – The Judicial Magistrate after considering the evidence and documents produced held that no

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.