Supreme Court of India
Sakkubai Etc. Etc. v. State of Karnataka & Ors. Etc. Etc.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In view of the foregoing factors, we do not find merit in the Appellants’ argument that the Hampi Act is purely prospective in nature and that the HWHAMA, which has been established under such Ac t, cannot enforce prior notifications.
Judgment, page 23
From the headnote
Mysore Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1961 – ss. 19(1) & 19(3) – 1988 notification declaring Virupapura Gaddi as ‘protected areas’ u/s. 19(3) of the Act, 1961 – Validity of – Held: The Archaeological Survey o f India (ASI) had highlighted the archaeological importance of Virupa pura Gaddi in its Statement of objections filed before the High Court – From the observations made by the ASI, a specialise d body responsible for archaeological research and conservation of c ultural monuments in India, there remains little doubt as to the historical
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.