Supreme Court of India

R. Muthukrishnan v. The Registrar General of the High Court of Judicature at Madras

Neutral citation
Reported as [2019] 1 S.C.R. 589
Bench Arun Mishra and Vineet Saran JJ.
Decided 28 January 2019

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We are of the view that the privilege of being an Advoca te- on-Record under the Rules has clearly been abused b y the contemnor.

Judgment, page 69

From the headnote

Rules of High Court of Madras, 1970: rr. 14A, 14B, 14C and 14D (as inserted by amendment in 2016) – Empowerment of High Court to debar an advoca te from practicing – Validity of – Held: High Court Rules have been f ramed in exercise of powers conferred u/s. 34 of Advocates Act – Section 34 does not confer power to frame rules to debar a lawyer for professional misconduct – It is apparent from the p rovisions and the scheme of the Advocates Act that the Act never intende d to confer disciplinary powers upon the High Court or Supreme Court exc ept to the extent dealing with an appeal u/s. 38 of

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.