Supreme Court of India
Smt. Chintambaramma & Anr. v. State of Karnataka
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
In view of the aforesaid judgments, we find that since the prosecution story proceeded on the basis that the role of the appellants is that of conspirators but having failed to prove the charge of conspiracy, the appellants could not be convicted for the offence under Section 302 IPC. Such conviction has caused not only prejudice but also failure of justice, therefore, conviction cannot be sustained.
Judgment, page 11
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860 – s.302 r/w s.34 – Case based on circumstantial evidence – Mar riage of ‘S’ was solemnised with one ‘LM’ in 2006 – FIR was lodged in 2009 by CW -1 that ‘S’ has been killed by the appellants (mother-in-law and sister-in-law of ‘S’) along with ‘LM’ and others – T rial Cour t convicted the appellants and ‘LM’ for having conspir ed the mur der of ‘S’ with accused nos.4 and 5, however accused nos.6 to 8 wer e acquitted – High Cour t acquitted ‘LM’ but maintained sentence of the appellants – On appeal, held: Entire pr osecution pr oceeded on the basis that accused nos.4 and 5 wer e
Authorities it was built on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.