Supreme Court of India
Britannia Industries Ltd. v. Bombay Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
From the headnote
Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulat ion) Act, 1963 – s. 2(1)(a) – “Agricultural Produce” – Products “ edible oil”, “ Vanaspati” and “ sugar ” – Applicability of the Act – Held: Products “ edible oil ”, “ Vanaspati” and “ sugar ” are agricultural produce within the meaning of s.2(1)(a) of the Act. Dismissing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 The High Court rightly held that sugar is a produce of agriculture coming into being in a proces sed form from sugarcane and the absence of the word “manufacture” in the definition of “ agricultural produce ” under Section 2(1)(a) of the
Authorities it was built on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.