Supreme Court of India

V. Surendra Mohan v. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors.

Neutral citation
Reported as [2019] 1 S.C.R. 954
Bench Ashok Bhushan and K. M. Joseph JJ.
Decided 22 January 2019

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

In view of the foregoing discussions, we, thus, came to the conclusion that prescription of disability to the extent of 40%-50% for recruitment for the post of Ci vil Judge (Junior Division) was valid and does not contravene any of the provisions of the Act, 1995 or any other statutory provision.

Judgment, page 28

From the headnote

Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protectio n of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 – Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission (TNPC) received a requisition from the State Government for 162 posts of Civil Judge (Junior Division) – TNPC pr oposed to notify the percentage of disability as 40%-50% for p artially blind and partially deaf – State Government by order date d 08.08.2014 communicated the decision to go ahead with the perc entage of disability as 40%-50% for partially blind and parti ally deaf with the consultation of the High Court – Pursuant thereto, TNPC is sued

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.