Supreme Court of India

M/s Adani Power (mundra) Ltd. v. Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission and Ors.

Neutral citation
Reported as [2019] 8 S.C.R. 1017
Bench Arun Mishra, B. R. Gavai and Surya Kant JJ.
Decided 2 July 2019

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We hold that termination is valid and legal, question would arise as to at what rate the appellant is entitled to c ompensatory tariff from the date of supply of power.

Judgment, page 40

From the headnote

Electricity Act, 2003 – ss. 86 (1) ( ), 95 – Respon dent No. 2-Procurer initiated the process of bidding for supply of power on long term basis, by issuing Request for Qualific ation – Three separate bids were invited – Appellant was selected as a successful bidder in respect of bid no. 2 for supplying 1000 MW power at t he rate of Rs. 2.35 per Kwh – Consequently, Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) came to be entered into between the procurer and the appellant – Appellant contended that the bid submitted by it was on the ba sis of the assurance given by Gujarat Mineral Developme nt Corporation

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.