Supreme Court of India
The State of Tamil Nadu v. Dr. Vasanthi Veerasekaran
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
In view of the above, we have no hesitation in setting aside the impugned judgment and, resultantly, dismissing the writ petitions filed by the private respondent(s).
Judgment, page 16
From the headnote
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – Allotment of alternate housing site to the displaced persons – Property owned and p ossessed by the private respondents were acquired for the purpo se of implementing ‘Mass Rapid Transport System’ (MRTS) R ailway project, under the provision of the Act, 1894 – Writ petiti ons – High Court while rejecting the challenge to acquisition proceedings observed that the appropriate authority of the State Govern ment to consider the representation made by private respond ents for allotment of a housing site by way of rehabilitatio n – Pursuant thereto, representation was
Authorities it was built on
- 2012 V. Chandrasekaran & Anr. v. The Administrative Officer & Ors.
- 1986 State of U.P. Etc. v. Smt. Pista Devi & Ors.
- 1988 Bharat Singh & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Ors.
- 1997 State of Kerala and Ors. v. M. Bhaskaran Pillai and Anr.
- 1995 New Reviera Co-op. Housing Society v. Special Land Acquisition Officer
- 1993 Hansraj H. Jain v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.