Supreme Court of India

Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Rahul Modi and Anr. Etc.

Neutral citation
Reported as [2019] 5 S.C.R. 91
Bench Abhay Manohar Sapre and Uday Umesh Lalit JJ.
Decided 27 March 2019

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We are of the view that the petitioner could and indeed ought to have filed an application for grant of bail which prayer could be allowed by the court below, having regard to the nature of the offences allegedly committed by the petitioner and the attendant circumstances.

Judgment, page 30

From the headnote

Companies Act, 2013 – ss. 212(1), (2) and (3) – Investigation into affairs of Company by Serious Fraud Investigation Office – Period within which r eport is contemplated to be submitted to the Central Government under sub-section (3), mandator y or dir ector y – On facts, SIFO dir ected to investigate into the affairs of cer tain entities and furnish the r eport within the period of thr ee months – However , petitioners ar rested by SIFO after the expiry of the specified period for investigation u/s. 213(2) – W rit petition by petitioners seeking declaration that investigation carried out

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.