Supreme Court of India

Government of Nct of Delhi v. Union of India & Another

Neutral citation
Reported as [2018] 7 S.C.R. 1
Bench Dipak Misra, A. K. Sikri, A. M. Khanwilkar, Dr. D. Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan JJ.
Decided 4 July 2018

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

15 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

In view of the foregoing discussions we arrive on the following conclusions on the issues which have arisen before us: CONCLUSIONS I. The interpretation of the Constitution has to be purposive taking into consideration the need of time and Constitutional principle s.

Judgment, page 376

From the headnote

Constitution of India: Art. 239AA and 239AB – Special provisions with resp ect to Delhi – National Capital Territory of Delhi – Status of – Held: NCT of Delhi cannot be accorded the status of a State under the pre sent constitutional scheme – Status of NCT of Delhi is sui generis – Status of Lieutenant Governor of Delhi is not that of a Go vernor of a State, rather he remains an Administrator, in a limited sense, working with the designation of Lieutenant Governor – LG cannot act independently and is bound by the aid and advice of the elected council of ministers subject to proviso to Art.

Authorities it was built on

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.