Supreme Court of India
The State of Maharashtra v. Surendra Pundlik Gadling & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Unlawful Activities (Pr evention) Act, 1967 – s.43D(2)(b), proviso – Claim of r espondents/detenues for default bail based on the plea of non-fulfilment of r equirement of pr oviso to s.43D(2)(b) – In the instant case, application for extension of period for investigation was filed by IO – On the same day itself, another application was filed under s.43D of the Act, for extension of period for fur ther investigation and filing of char ge-sheet in the said crime enumerating gr ounds in detail and signed by the Public Prosecutor – Request made in the application was granted – Aggrieved,
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2024 State of Nct of Delhi v. Raj Kumar @ Lovepreet @lovely
- 2022 Jigar @ Jimmy Pravinchandra Adatiya v. State of Gujarat
Of those, 1 referred to · 1 not applicable
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.