Supreme Court of India
Kamal Kumar v. Premlata Joshi & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
6 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In view of the foregoing discussion, we find no merit in this appeal.
Judgment, page 5
From the headnote
Constitution of India – Art.136 – Scope of interfer ence – Concurrent findings of fact by lower courts – Held: The concur rent findings of facts recorded by the two Courts below on all the ma terial issues are binding on Supreme Court when there is no perversit y or illegality in the findings – In the instant case, s uit for specific performance of contract was filed in relation to the suit land – ourts below held that the plaintiff failed to prove his r eadiness and willingness to perform his part of the contract – T he issue of readiness and willingness, is the most important issue for con
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 K.R. Suresh v. R. Poornima & Ors.
- 2025 Sangita Sinha v. Bhawana Bhardwaj and Ors.
- 2024 Parswanath Saha v. Bandhana Modak (das) and Anr.
- 2024 R. Kandasamy (since Dead) & Ors. v. T.R.K. Sarawathy & Anr.
- 2022 P. Daivasigamani v. S. Sambandan
- 2026 V.n.a.s.chandran v. Mrs. S. Venilla and Ors.
Of those, 5 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.