Supreme Court of India
Anokhilal v. State of Madhya Pradesh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
10 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Legal Services: Grant of free legal aid – Real and meaningful assistance – Entitlement to – On facts, in the case of rape and murder of a minor girl, appointment of counsel through legal services to represent the accused-appellant – The day the counsel appointed, on the same day charges framed against the appellant for offence punishable u/ss. 363, 366, 377, 376(2)(f) and 302 IPC r/ w s. 6 of POCSO Act – Thereafter, conviction of appellant and impositi on of death sentence and other sentences by courts below – On appeal, held: The day Amicus Curiae was named, on the same date, the counsel was
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 Tarun Sharma v. State of Haryana
- 2025 Irfan Alias Bhayu Mevati v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- 2026 Bhola Mahto v. The State of Jharkhand
- 2025 Dashwanth v. State of Tamil Nadu
- 2025 Waris v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- 2025 Sovaran Singh Prajapati v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
- 2024 Ashok v. State of Uttar Pradesh
- 2024 Sunita Devi v. The State of Bihar & Anr
- 2023 Naveen @ Ajay v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
- 2020 Ganesan v. State Represented by its Inspector of Police
Of those, 2 relied on · 6 referred to · 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.