Supreme Court of India
Huda v. Vidya Chetal
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the determination of the dispute concerning the validity of the imposition of a statutory due arising out of a “ deficiency in service ”, can be undertaken by the consumer fora as per the provisions of the Act.
Judgment, page 15
From the headnote
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – ss.2(1)(d)-(g), 2(1 )(o) – Interpretation of – Law laid down by Supreme Court in HUDA vs. Sunita holding that the National Consumer Disputes Redress al Commission (NCDRC) had no jurisdiction to adjudicate the legali ty behind the demand of “composition fee” and “extension fee” made by HUDA, as the same being statutory obligation, does not qua lify as “deficiency in service” – Validity of – Held: Ce rtain statutory dues, such as fees, can arise out of a specific relation – Suc h statutory dues might be charged as quid pro quo for a privilege conferred or service
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 relied on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.