Supreme Court of India
Rashid Raza v. Sadaf Akhtar
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the view that the disputes raised between the parties are arbitrable and, hence, a Section 11 appl ication under the Arbitration Act would be maintainable.
Judgment, page 4
From the headnote
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: s. 11 – Appoi ntment of arbitrator – Partnership deed between the parties – Partner ship dispute – FIR by one of the partners alleging sipho ning of funds and various business improprieties – Application u/ s. 11 for appointment of arbitrator under the arbitration clause – Dis missal of the application – On appeal, held: There is distinc tion between serious allegations of forgery/fabrication in support of the plea of fraud as opposed to “simple allegations” – Two workin g tests are whether the plea permeate the entire contract and a bove all, the
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2020 Avitel Post Studioz Limited & Ors. v. Hsbc Pi Holdings (mauritius) Limited
- 2026 Rajia Begum v. Barnali Mukherjee
- 2023 Sushma Shivkumar Daga & Anr. v. Madhurkumar Ramkrishnaji Bajaj & Ors
- 2021 M/s. N.N. Global Mercantile Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s. Indo Unique Flame Ltd. & Others
Of those, 1 relied on · 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.