Supreme Court of India
Sushil Kumar Agarwal v. Meenakshi Sadhu & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Specific Relief Act, 1963 – s.14(3)(c)(i) and (ii) – Specific performance of contract under – Appellant-developer and predecessor -in-inter est of the r espondents enter ed into a development agr eement for constr uction of a building on the land of the r espondents – Respondent denied execution of the agr eement – Appellant filed for specific performance of the contract against the r espondent – Held: The appellant-developer need to satisfy the two conditions laid out in sub clause (i) and (ii) of s.14(3)(c), for the suit for specific performance to be maintainable against the owner – The
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2023 Victory Iron Works Ltd. v. Jitendra Lohia & Anr
- 2022 Rameshwar and Ors v. State of Haryana & Ors.
- 2020 Mr. Rajendra K. Bhutta v. Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority through its Chairman & Anr.
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 distinguished · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.