Supreme Court of India

Shailesh Manubhai Parmar v. Election Commission of India through the Chief Election Commissioner & Ors.

Neutral citation
Reported as [2018] 10 S.C.R. 76
Bench Dipak Misra, A. M. Khanwilkar and Dr. D. Y. Chandrachud JJ.
Decided 21 August 2018

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

In view of the aforesaid analysis, the writ petition is allowed and the circulars issued by the Election Commission, the first respondent herein, introducing NOTA in respect of elections to the Council of States are hereby quashed.

Judgment, page 24

From the headnote

Constitution of India: Art. 80(4) – Election for Council of States – Applicabi lity of the option “None of the Above” (NOTA) – Election Co mmission introducing NOTA to Council of States elections – hallenged u/Art. 32 of the Constitution – Held: NOTA was intr oduced for direct elections i.e. of Parliament and State Legislative Assemblies – There is distinction between direct election and indirect election – Option of NOTA to Council of States election, which is indirect election, would not only undermine the purity of de mocracy but also serve the satan of defection and corruption. Allowing

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 1 referred to · 1 mentioned

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.