Supreme Court of India
Narendra Kumar Tiwari & Ors. Etc. v. The State of Jharkhand & Ors. Etc.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the view that the Regularisation Rules must be given a pragmatic interpretat ion and the appellants, if they have completed 10 years of service on the date of NARENDRA KUMAR TIWARI & ORS. v.
Judgment, page 6
From the headnote
Service Law – Regularisation of daily wage or contr act workers – Appellants were irregularly appointed by the State of Jharkhand – Plea of Appellants that they had put in more tha n 10 years of service and therefore were entitled to be regularis ed – Plea rejected by the High Court – Further, High Court took the vie w that the decision of the Supreme Court in Umadevi (3) ca se did not permit regularisation of appellants since they had not worked for 10 years on the cut-off date of 10.04.2006 when the Constitution Bench rendered its decision – Held: High Court erred in takin g an impractical
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2021 University of Delhi v. Delhi University Contract Employees Union & Ors.
- 2022 The State of Gujarat and Others v. R.J. Pathan and Others
Of those, 1 referred to · 1 not applicable
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.