Supreme Court of India

Tehseen S. Poonawalla v. Union of India and Others

Neutral citation
Reported as [2018] 9 S.C.R. 291
Bench Dipak Misra, A. M. Khanwilkar and Dr. D. Y. Chandrachud JJ.
Decided 17 July 2018

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

In view of the aforesaid, we proceed to issue the following guidelines:- A. Preventive Measures (i) The State Governments shall designate, a senior police officer, not below the rank of Superintendent of Police, as Nodal Officer in each district.

Judgment, page 34

From the headnote

Constitution of India – Art. 32 – Cow protection gr oups indulging in violence – Cow vigilantism and other i ncidents of lynching – Writ petition u/Art. 32 seeking direction to State to take immediate and necessary action against the cow protection groups indulging in violence – Issuance of direction to remove the violent contents from the social media – Held: Act of lynching is unlawful – It is constitutional duty to take a call to protect lives and human rights – No citizen can assault the human dignity of another, for such an action would comatose the majesty of law – Authorities conferred

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 2 referred to

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.