Supreme Court of India
Sonvir @ Somvir v. The State of Nct of Delhi
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In view of the foregoing discussion we are of the opinion that view of the Delhi High Court that evidence of fingerprints of the accused has to be discarded cannot be supported for the reasons given i n the impugned judgment of the Delhi High Court.
Judgment, page 36
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860: ss. 302 and 392 u/s. 34 – Prosecution of three accu sed, including appellant (accused No. 2) – For double mu rder – u/ss. 120- , 302, 392 and 397-IPC – Trial court relying o n the circumstantial evidence viz. recoveries at the behest of the accused and the report of the fingerprint expert, convicted all the accused – High Court, upheld conviction of appellant-accused No. 2 and accused No. 1 – Accused No. 3 was acquitted granting benefit of doubt – Appeal by accused No. 2 – Held: In the fact s and circumstances of the case, recoveries cannot be tak en as incriminating
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2023 Santosh @ Bhure v. State (g.n.c.t.) of Delhi
- 2022 Manoj & Ors v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- 2019 Smt. Gargi v. State of Haryana
- 2019 Ashish Jain v. Makrand Singh and Ors.
Of those, 3 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.