Supreme Court of India
Shyam Narayan Prasad v. Krishna Prasad and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In the result, this appeal fails and it is accordingly dismissed.
Judgment, page 12
From the headnote
Hindu Law – Mitakshara law – Property allotted to so n in partition – Whether retains character of coparcener y property – Held: Share which a coparcener obtains on partition o f ancestral property is ancestral property as regards his male issue – After partition, the property in the hands of the son will c ontinue to be the ancestral property and the natural or adopted s on of that son will take interest in it and is entitled to it by surviv orship – On facts, properties acquired by son in the partition although ar e separate property qua other relations but it is a coparcenary proper ty in
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 M.S. Ananthamurthy & Anr. v. J. Manjula
- 2019 Arshnoor Singh v. Harpal Kaur & Ors.
- 2019 Govindbhai Chhotabhai Patel & Ors. v. Patel Ramanbhai Mathurbhai
Of those, 2 relied on · 1 distinguished
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.