Supreme Court of India
Apparaju Malhar Rao v. Tula Venkataiah@ Venkat Rao (dead) & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
We are of the considered view that the impugned order is not legally sustainable and thus liable to be set aside.
Judgment, page 4
From the headnote
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - s. JOO - Second appeal - Substantial question of law - On facts, High Court did not frame any substantial question of law as is required to be framed at the time of admission of the second appeal and allowed the second appeal filed by respondent No. I - Sustainability of - Held: Impugned order not legally sustainable and is set aside - Matter remanded to the High Court for deciding the second appeal afresh. Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: The reasons to remand the case to the High Court has occasioned because the High Court while allowing the second appeal
Authorities it was built on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.