Supreme Court of India

Seeni Nainar Mohammed v. State Rep. by Deputy Superintendent of Police

Neutral citation
Reported as [2017] 3 S.C.R. 312
Bench Pinaki Chandra Ghose and R. F. Nariman JJ.
Decided 27 April 2017

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

From the headnote

Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - s.20A - Cognizance of offence - Prior approval of sanctioning authority - Compliance of - On facts, individual attacked by appellants with weapons, resulting in his death - Conviction of the appellants uls. J 20B rlw ss. 302, 147, 148 and 149 JPC and ss. 3(2), (3), (4) of TADA and sentenced to life imprisonment by courts below - On appeal, held: Section 20- (l) must be construed by indicating that prior approval from the competent authority is mandatory for taking cognizance of offence punishable under TADA - However, sanctioning

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 2 referred to

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.