Supreme Court of India

Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms v. Union of India and Another

Neutral citation
Reported as [2017] 12 S.C.R. 331
Bench Dipakmisra, R. K. Agrawal, Arun Mishra and Amitava Roy A. Nd A. M. Khanwilkar JJ.
Decided 10 November 2017

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

In view of the aforesaid, any order passed which is contrary to this order be treated as ineffective in law and not binding on the Chief Justice oflndia.

Judgment, page 6

From the headnote

Supreme Court: Allocation of cases - Composition of Benches - There can be no doubt that on the judicial side the Chief Justice is the first amongst the equals, but as far as the roster is concerned, the Chief Justice is the master of the roster and he alone has the prerogative to constitute the Benches of the Court and allocate cases to the Benches so constituted - Neither a two-Judge Bench nor a three-Judge Bench can allocate the matter to themselves or direct the composition for constitution of a Bench - There cannot be any direction to the Chief Justice of India as to who slulll be

Authorities it was built on

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 1 followed

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.